Skip to content
IdeaScore
Blog

Notes on running better calls

Rubrics, rounds, evaluator workload and the administrative detail that decides whether a call finishes on time. Written for the people who run programmes, by the team that builds the platform they run them on.

Latest7 min read

How to design a rubric committees trust

Criteria, descriptors, weights and anchoring, and why a 0 to 10 scale with written descriptors produces a ranking a committee can defend.

Read the article

  • Running a multi-round seed-fund call

    A timeline, three rounds, promotion rules written before the scores exist, and the workload arithmetic that decides how many evaluators you need.

    RoundsProgramme design7 min read

  • What grounded AI evaluation means

    The difference between an assistant that writes a plausible paragraph and one that researches and cites, and where an AI co-evaluator belongs in scoring.

    IdeaScore AIEvaluation7 min read

  • Resubmissions, duplicates and lineage

    Teams resubmit for good reasons and bad ones. How to tell the difference fairly, keep a lineage chain, and give evaluators one version to score.

    ReviewIntegrity7 min read

New articles every few weeks.Subscribe by RSS

See IdeaScore run a call with your own rubric

A 30-minute walkthrough with a founder, using your programme's form and criteria.